Drawing for GRISWOLD

USPTO serial 77321459

GRISWOLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3713502Status 780Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 17, 2009
Examiner
MCDOWELL, MATTHEW J
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with GRISWOLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wendi Opper Uzar

Wendi Opper Uzar Riker Danzig LLP7 Giralda Farms, Suite 250Madison, NJ 07940United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021cookware, namely, skillets, [ griddles, dutch ovens, kettles, pots, ] and pansACTIVESep 18, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 14, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 14, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 19, 2025TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS
May 19, 2025CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
May 19, 2025CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999
Feb 28, 2024PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Apr 22, 2021ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jul 22, 2020NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED
Jul 22, 2020RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jul 22, 202089AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jul 20, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 3, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
May 18, 2020E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Jan 30, 2019TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS
Jan 30, 2019CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jan 30, 2019CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999
Nov 17, 2018REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Dec 13, 2017PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jun 3, 2016NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED
Jun 3, 20168.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jun 3, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 16, 2016ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED
Jun 4, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Apr 30, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Nov 17, 2009R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Oct 13, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 13, 2009CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER
Oct 13, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 13, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 13, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 13, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 13, 2009IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED
Oct 9, 2009AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Oct 9, 2009IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Oct 8, 2009EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED
Apr 22, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Apr 22, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 22, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 20, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 20, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 20, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 8, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 5, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 8, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance