USPTO serial 77322362
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheila M. Riley
SHEILA M. RILEY REYNOLDS, CASAS & RILEY, LLP1 1ST ST STE 2LOS ALTOS, CA 94022-2753UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Furniture; home decor, namely, chair cushions, bedroom furniture, cabinets, cast stone household and garden furniture, cushions, dinner wagons, doors for furniture, entertainment centers, fitted fabric furniture covers, fitted furniture cover not of fabric, furniture chests, furniture for house, office and garden, furniture frames, furniture hardware, namely, drawer slides, furniture made from wood or substitutes of wood, furniture moldings, furniture partitions, furniture parts, namely, chair legs, table leaves, and arm rests, furniture, namely, dressers and wardrobes, Indoor window treatments, namely, blinds and shades, mirrors, recliners, screens, seating furniture, stone furniture, tables, towel closets, toy boxes, washstands, and pillows | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Apparel, as well as accessories related thereto, namely, tops, shirts, T-shirts, sweatshirts, tank tops, vests, blouses, coats, overcoats, tuxedos, suits, jackets, sports coats, sweaters, pullovers, jumpers, skirts, dresses, body suits, leotards, leggings, pants, trousers, sweatpants, shorts, swimwear, gloves, socks, underwear, and belts; headwear, namely, caps, hats, and visors; footwear, namely, shoes and sandals | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |