USPTO serial 77323289
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
7418 Deventer, NL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEWIS F. GOULD, JR.
LEWIS F GOULD JR DUANE MORRIS LLP30 SOUTH 17TH STREETPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-4196UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations, namely, anti-coagulants, vitamins and minerals, beverages, food and meals for medically restricted diets; baby food; all-purpose disinfectants; disinfectants for contact lenses; disinfectants for chemical toilets and general hygienic use, medical instruments and for sanitation purposes, except syringes, cannulae and needles; herbicides, insecticides, pesticides and fungicides for home, garden and professional use, all the foregoing sold in containers and in cans, none of the foregoing goods are flexible packaging of snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | General purpose metal containers, cans and lids made primarily of metal; containers, cans and lids made primarily of metal for use with food, beverages, pharmaceuticals, paints and coatings, and chemical- technical contents, none of the foregoing goods are flexible packaging of snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Closures for containers, made primarily of cardboard or paper, not for use with hardware and tools; plastic bags for packaging; plastic food storage bags for household use, none of the foregoing goods are flexible packaging of snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Containers, not of metal for commercial use; containers for industrial and commercial liquids not made of metal; non-metal closures for containers, plastic lids, plastic lids for cans, plastic caps; packing containers made primarily of plastic material, plastic containers, namely, tubs for consumer products packaging, plastic boxes, storage containers for commercial or industrial use, made primarily of plastic, plastic storage drums, none of the foregoing goods are flexible packaging of snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry, game, meat extracts; prepared meals composed primarily of meat and vegetables or meat or vegetables; prepared cooked meals containing meat and vegetables or meat or vegetables; processed, canned, dried, preserved and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, fruit sauces, namely, apple sauce and cranberry sauce, eggs, milk and milk-based beverages containing fruit juice, fruits and coffee; powdered milk for food purposes; soy milk; edible oils and fats, all the foregoing sold in containers and in cans, none of the foregoing goods are flexible packaging of snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from processed cereals, namely, wheat, rice, rye, oats, maize, buckwheat, millet; bread, pastry and confectionery, namely, flavored fruit and confectionery ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder; salt; mustard; vinegar; sauces; spices; ice; fruit sauces excluding cranberry sauce and apple sauce; milk shakes, all the foregoing sold in containers and cans, none of the foregoing goods are flexible packaging of snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Animal food, sold in containers and in cans, none of the foregoing goods are flexible packaging of snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 19, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |