Drawing for WOOLBEING

USPTO serial 77327588

WOOLBEING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BURNS, ELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WOOLBEING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott S Havlick

SCOTT S HAVLICK HOLLAND & HART LLPP.O. BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80302UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Pillows, made in whole or in significant part, of woolACTIVE
024Bedding, namely, mattress pads, blankets, and sheets, all made in whole or in significant part, of woolACTIVE
025Footwear; booties, clothing, namely, socks, shirts, pants, tights, underwear, tops, bottoms, shorts, jackets, sweaters, hats, caps, gloves, mittens, balaclavas, neck gaiters, headliners, scarves and headbands, all made in whole or in significant part, of woolACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 23, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 23, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 23, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 23, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 30, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 22, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 21, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 21, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 21, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 21, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 21, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 21, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Aug 1, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Jul 23, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 22, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 22, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 15, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 17, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Nov 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance