USPTO serial 77327999
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Rochester Hills, MI
Rochester Hills, MI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey P. Thennisch
JEFFREY P. THENNISCH DOBRUSIN & THENNISCH, P.C.29 W. LAWRENCE STREETSUITE 210PONTIAC, MI 48342-2183| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | GOODS MADE OF PRECIOUS METALS AND THEIR ALLOYS, NAMELY, KEY CHAINS, KEY FOBS, KEY RINGS, CUFFLINKS, JEWELRY CASES, MONEY CLIPS, HOROLOGICAL AND CHRONOMETRIC INSTRUMENTS, WATCH BRACELETS, TIEBARS, TIE CLIPS, AND TIE PINS | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | LEATHER AND NON-LEATHER BRIEFCASES, WALLETS, HAND BAGS, PURSES, BACK PACKS, CARD HOLDERS BEING BUSINESS AND CREDIT CARD CASES, LEATHER AND IMITATION LEATHER KEY CHAINS, UMBRELLAS, TRAVEL BAGS, GARMENT BAGS FOR TRAVEL, AND TRUNKS, LEATHER COMBINATION TIES, NAMELY, STRAPS FOR LUGGAGE AND HANDBAGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | TANK TOPS, SWEATERS, CARDIGANS, VESTS, SWEATPANTS, SHORTS, UNDERWEAR, FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, RIDING BOOTS, WESTERN AND WORK BOOTS AND SHOES, OUTERWEAR, NAMELY, DUSTERS, COATS, AND JACKETS, DENIM WEAR AND DENIM WEARING APPAREL IN THE NATURE OF PANTS, JACKETS AND SHIRTS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |