USPTO serial 77334145
MUDCRUTCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3974862Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 7, 2011
- Examiner
- PHAM, LANA H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MUDCRUTCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SHERMAN OAKS, CA
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
Sherman Oaks, CA
Sherman Oaks, CA
Sherman Oaks, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori S. Kozak
Lori S. Kozak FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP997 LENOX DRIVE, BUILDING 3Princeton Pike Corporate CenterLAWRENCEVILLE, NJ 08648-2311Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Conducting and arranging musical concert tours [ ; providing on-line publications in the nature of liner notes in the field of music and musical artists ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PETTY TRADEMARKS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PETTY LEGACY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Petty, Thomas Earl
- Other trademarks owned by Petty, Thomas Earl
- Other trademarks owned by Petty, Thomas Earl
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named MUDCRUTCH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2017 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2017 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 21, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 4, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |