USPTO serial 77334315
ZFREQUENCY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZFREQUENCY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
john richard troll
JOHN RICHARD TROLL THE LAW OFFICE OF JOHN RICHARD TROLL LLC3815 RIVER CROSSING PKWYINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46240-7746UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and advertisement services; preparation of custom advertisements for others; providing a web site which features advertisements for the goods and services of others on a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Customized real estate management services for real estate property clients; providing information in the field of real estate via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing multiple user access to proprietary collections of information in the field of real estate by means of global computer information networks; Voice over IP (VoIP) services; and worldwide switch text and message transmission services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, hosting on-line web facilities for others for organizing and conducting online meetings, gatherings, and interactive discussions; computer services, namely, creating an online community for registered users to participate in competitions, showcase their skills, get feedback from their peers, form virtual communities, engage in social networking and improve their talent | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2012 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |