Drawing for HARTZ BUILD A BED SYSTEM

USPTO serial 77334489

HARTZ BUILD A BED SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BOONE, JOHN C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARTZ BUILD A BED SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy B. Goldsmith

AMY B. GOLDSMITH GOTTLIEB RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVENUE, 8TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020(Based on Use in Commerce) Pet beds; Mattresses for dogs; Assembly system for creating personalized pet beds consisting of pet beds, mattresses for pet beds, and mattress covers for pets beds; (Based on Intent to Use) Mattresses for cats; Pillows for pets; Assembly system for creating personalized pet beds consisting of pet pillows, pillowcases for pet pillows, and throw blankets for petsACTIVEOct 8, 2007
024(Based on Use in Commerce) Mattress covers for pet beds; (Based on Intent to Use) Blankets for pets; Throw blankets for pets; Pillow cases for pet beds; Towels for petsACTIVEOct 8, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 12, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 12, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Dec 8, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Dec 8, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED
May 20, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 20, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 20, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 9, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 16, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 27, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 5, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 5, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 5, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 5, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 5, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 29, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 28, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 27, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Nov 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance