USPTO serial 77334790
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norman P. Soloway
NORMAN P. SOLOWAY HAYES-SOLOWAY P.C.3450 E SUNRISE DR STE 140TUCSON, AZ 85718-3230UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for use in computer networking and data communications; computer hardware and software for wired and wireless data communications; computer interface devices, namely, computer interface boards; computer interface software, namely, graphical user interface software; computer networking hardware, namely, computer network interface busses and switches; computer networking and communications test equipment, namely, circuit testers; software for use in the design and testing of computer communications networks, all for military, governmental and commercial fields | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2009 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 18, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |