Drawing for HARMONY GOLD & SILVER

USPTO serial 77335262

HARMONY GOLD & SILVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FRAZIER, TAMARA G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARMONY GOLD & SILVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Max Moskowitz

MAX MOSKOWITZ OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN, LLP1180 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASFLOOR 7NEW YORK, NY 10036-8443

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Gold jewelry, namely, rings, bracelets, pendants, earrings, necklaces, brooches, pins and cufflinksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 24, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
May 24, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
May 11, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 5, 2010RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Mar 5, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Feb 3, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 3, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 1, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Feb 1, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 1, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Feb 1, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jul 30, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 30, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 30, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 29, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 24, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 26, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 24, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 13, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
May 13, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
May 12, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Apr 24, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 24, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 24, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 23, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 28, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Nov 27, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance