USPTO serial 77336670
LONDON SPECIALITY TEA CO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3645532Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 30, 2009
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LONDON SPECIALITY TEA CO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Merseyside CH46 8 XF, GB
Merseyside CH46 8 XF, GB
Merseyside CH46 8 XF, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce W. McKee
BRUCE W. MCKEE MCKEE, VOORHEES & SEASE, PLC.801 GRAND AVNUE, SUITE 3200DES MOINES, IA 50309-2721UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Flavourings and seasonings; flavoring additives for non-nutritional purposes in beverages; coffee, mixtures of coffee and chicory, coffee essences, coffee extracts, artificial coffee, coffee preparations, drinks containing coffee; chicory and chicory mixtures, all for use as substitutes for coffee; cocoa, cocoa mixes, cocoa spreads, cocoa drinks; chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; tea, herbal tea, black tea, green tea, fruit tea, fruit and herbal flavored tea, tea essences, tea extracts, instant tea, tea mixtures; tea infusions; custard powder; blancmange; baking powder; flour, flour concentrate, bran, wheatgerm; yeast; rusks; processed cereals and preparations made from cereals, namely, bread; breakfast cereal preparations; bread; bread products, namely, rolls, bagels and buns; pastry; farinaceous food pastes for human consumption; pastries and candy; tarts; biscuits; cookies, cakes; prepared meals consisting primarily of rice and pasta; snack food products, namely, pretzels, corn chips; chocolate; chocolate candies, syrups and pastes; chocolates and candies; processed herbs, spices; sugar, rice, tapioca, sago; edible ices; honey; treacle; salt, mustard, pepper, vinegar, sauces; ice; ice cream, ice cream cakes; water ices and frozen confections | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |