USPTO serial 77337064
PUR CURX ELECTROSTATIC AIR FILTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PUR CURX ELECTROSTATIC AIR FILTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
E. Blair Forrest
E. Blair Forrest Pushor Mitchell LLP301 - 1665 Ellis StreetKelowna, V1Y 2B3CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Chemical cleaning preparations for use in cleaning air-ducts | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Industrial robots for heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) cleaning; brushes, namely, as mechanical parts of or for use with a mechanical duct cleaning apparatus; filters for mechanical purposes for mechanical parts of industrial vacuum cleaners for ductwork and heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems; portable filtration heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) cleaning units comprised of an engine surrounded by a metal casing with a HEPA filter in the middle, together with external wheels for mobility purposes specifically for cleaning the HVAC systems; HEPA filters for use with industrial vacuum cleaners for cleaning ductwork | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) inspection cameras | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Electrostatic air filters for removing allergens from the air; portable filtration heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) cleaning units comprised of an engine surrounded by a metal casing with a HEPA filter in the middle, together with external wheels for mobility purposes specifically for cleaning the air; HEPA filters for use with vacuum cleaning systems for cleaning the air; filters for commercial heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems for cleaning the air | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Commercial and residential air-duct cleaning; furnace cleaning; pressure washing, namely, the flushing of cooling, heating and air-conditioning generator coils in residential and commercial heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems; cleaning commercial and residential exhaust systems, namely, cleaning laundry dryer exhaust systems for residential and commercial buildings; cleaning stale air exhaust systems for fresh-air make-up systems for commercial buildings; cleaning dryer exhaust systems and heat recovery ventilation systems in residential buildings | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Air quality control and testing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MODERN PURAIR INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MODERN PURAIR INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PUR CURX ELECTROSTATIC AIR FILTER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 26, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 6, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |