USPTO serial 77338042
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary A. Donovan, Esq.
MARY A. DONOVAN, ESQ. DONOVAN & YEE LLP161 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS, SUITE 1201NEW YORK, NY 10013UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRERECORDED CDS, DVDS, AND AUDIOCASSETTES FEATURING INSTRUCTIONAL TEACHING AND TESTING MATERIALS, FICTION AND NON-FICTION BOOKS, REFERENCE BOOKS, TEXTBOOKS AND WORKBOOKS ON A VARIETY OF TOPICS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN REFERENCE, TEACHING, TRAINING AND EDUCATION ON A VARIETY OF TOPICS AND TRADES; ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, BOOKS ON A VARIETY OF TOPICS AND TRADES; DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR REFERENCE, TEACHING, TRAINING AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ON A VARIETY OF TOPICS AND TRADES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL AND TESTING RESOURCE SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION AND TESTING SERVICES ON A VARIETY OF SUBJECTS FOR STUDENTS, PARENTS, AND EDUCATORS FROM GRADE PRE-K THROUGH THE POST-GRADUATE COLLEGE LEVEL; CONDUCTING EDUCATIONAL AND TRAINING WORKSHOPS FOR TEACHERS AND STUDENTS ON A VARIETY OF TOPICS AND TRADES FROM GRADE PRE-K THROUGH THE POST-GRADUATE COLLEGE LEVEL; CREATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF STANDARD CURRICULUM FOR OTHERS ON A VARIETY OF TOPICS AND TRADES; PROVIDING INTERACTIVE COURSES OF INSTRUCTION AND ADMINISTERING TESTS ON A VARIETY OF TOPICS AND TRADES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND DISTRIBUTING PRINTED MATERIALS, CD'S, AND DVD'S IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING SERVICES, NAMELY PUBLICATION OF TEXT AND GRAPHIC WORKS OF OTHERS ON CD-ROM, CDS, DVDS, AUDIOCASSETTES AND ON-LINE ON A VARIETY OF TOPICS AND TRADES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 9, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 11, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 10, 2010 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 26, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 26, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |