Drawing for VISIONSENSE INSIDE

USPTO serial 77338624

VISIONSENSE INSIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISIONSENSE INSIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brent E. Routman

BRENT E. ROUTMAN MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.PO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Optical apparatus and instruments, namely stereoscopes, stereoscopic cameras, stereoscopic probes, stereoscopic displays, 3D imaging processing hardware, 3D imaging processing software, 3D imaging manipulation modules, 3D imaging interpretation modules, all for non-medical purposes, and for real time or non real time 3D visualizationACTIVE
010Medical and optical diagnostic and surgical apparatus and instruments, namely stereoscopes, stereoscopic cameras, stereoscopic probes, stereoscopic displays, 3D imaging processing hardware, 3D imaging processing software, 3D imaging manipulation modules, 3D imaging interpretation modules, all for medical purposes, for the purpose of viewing or imaging of organs or tissuesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Jun 16, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jun 16, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Mar 10, 2010CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 9, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Mar 9, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Sep 9, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 8, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Aug 27, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 26, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Feb 26, 2009CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 25, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN
Feb 20, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Feb 20, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 20, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 20, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Aug 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 19, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 4, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Dec 3, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance