USPTO serial 77338624
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Petach Tivka, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brent E. Routman
BRENT E. ROUTMAN MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.PO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical apparatus and instruments, namely stereoscopes, stereoscopic cameras, stereoscopic probes, stereoscopic displays, 3D imaging processing hardware, 3D imaging processing software, 3D imaging manipulation modules, 3D imaging interpretation modules, all for non-medical purposes, and for real time or non real time 3D visualization | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical and optical diagnostic and surgical apparatus and instruments, namely stereoscopes, stereoscopic cameras, stereoscopic probes, stereoscopic displays, 3D imaging processing hardware, 3D imaging processing software, 3D imaging manipulation modules, 3D imaging interpretation modules, all for medical purposes, for the purpose of viewing or imaging of organs or tissues | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |