USPTO serial 77338726
BABYSTROLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BABYSTROLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
E. Lynn Perry
E. Lynn Perry Perry IP Group A.L.C.900 LARKSPUR LANDING CIRSte 226Larkspur, CA 94939Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded audiotapes, videotapes, DVDs, and CDs relating to pregnancy, childbirth, babies and related subjects; refrigerator magnets; mouse pads; downloadable computer software to be used by customers to track pregnancy, time contractions, track child development, and other matters relating to pregnancy, childbirth and babies; children's educational software that teaches baby sign language, stimulates visual development, and assists in selection of babies' names | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Ornaments of precious metal; jewelry trinket boxes | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Books in the field of pregnancy, childbirth, babies and related subjects; journals concerning pregnancy, childbirth, babies and related subjects; calendars; greeting cards; postcards; art prints; posters; stickers; lunch bags; paper bags; party ornaments of paper; coasters of paper | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | All-purpose carrying bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Holiday ornaments of plastic; pillows | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Coasters not of paper and not being table linen; mugs; decorative ceramic tiles not for use as building materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing namely shirts, pants, maternity clothing, undergarments, hats, aprons | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | buttons | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Christmas tree ornaments; teddy bears | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Online retail store services featuring products relating to pregnancy, childbirth, and babies; on-line advertising on computer communications networks, namely, posting advertisement for products and services of others on a website | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing a website featuring information and activities relating to pregnancy, childbirth, and babies, including baby games, and exercise and fitness before and after pregnancy and childbirth; educational services, namely, namely, providing classes, seminars, and workshops in the field of pregnancy, childbirth and babies | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Providing a website featuring health information and activities relating to pregnancy, childbirth, and babies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by McCurley, Vincent
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named BABYSTROLOGY
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |