USPTO serial 77339077
REG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 13, 2010
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with REG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RENO, NV
RENO, NV
RENO, NV
Yavne, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard W. Kline
Howard W. Kline Nath, Goldberg & Meyer112 S West StreetALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Non-biodiesel waste heat power plants | ACTIVE | May 7, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Ormat Industries Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named REG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 28, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 25, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 27, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 7, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 22, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 22, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 21, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |