USPTO serial 77339958
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Marietta, GA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Russell L. Sandidge
Russell L. Sandidge Kaplan Ward & Patel, LLC3100 Cumberland Boulevard, Suite 3100Cumberland Center IIAtlanta, GA 30339| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Styling lotions; Sun-block lotions; Sun-tanning oils and lotions; Toning lotion, for the face, body and hands; Hand lotions; Lotions for cosmetic purposes; Lotions for face and body care; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners and peels; Non-medicated stimulating lotions for the skin; Shaving lotion; Skin and body topical lotions, creams and oils for cosmetic use; Skin lotion; Aromatherapy lotions; Baby lotion; Body lotion; Facial lotion; Hair lotion; Non-medicated diaper rash ointments and lotions; Bath lotion | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |