USPTO serial 77340118
DHARMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DHARMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jon M. Gibbs
Jon M. Gibbs AKERMAN SENTERFITT420 South Orange AvenueSuite 1200Orlando, FL 32801Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management; business administration; office functions; business information services and appraisals; statistical information services; business information storage and retrieval services; promotional, publicity, marketing and advertising services; recording and registering of the transfer of stocks, shares and securities; maintaining records of ownership of stocks, shares and securities; settlement services for transfers of stocks, shares, and securities; maintaining records of settlements for transfers of stocks, shares and securities; information services relating to business appraisals and statistical business information; compilation, dissemination and provision of business, commercial and companies information; business research; provision of business statistical information; information provided online from a computer database or from the Internet, all relating to company valuations and earnings reports; information, advice and consultancy services for all of the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |