USPTO serial 77341618
TODAY PANDA PANDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORNDORFF, LINDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TODAY PANDA PANDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Arrowroot for use as a food thickener; Barley flour; Buckwheat flour; Candy for food; Cereal based snack food; Cereal-based snack foods; Chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; Chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars; Coffee flavored syrup used in making food beverages; Corn flour; Corn starch; Corn starch based drink, in the nature of a food beverage consisting primarily of maize and porridge; Corn-based snack foods; Farinaceous food pastes for human consumption; Flavor enhancers used in food and beverage products; Flour for food; Food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring; Food flavorings; Food leavening agents; Food package combinations consisting primarily of bread, crackers and/or cookies; Food starch; Fruit paste for flavouring of food; Glucose for food; Gluten for food; Grain-based food beverages; Grain-based snack foods; Herb tea; Herbal food beverages; Herbal tea; Honey; Inulin for use as a food starch; Japanese arrowroot powder (kudzu-ko,for food); Malt extracts for food; Malt for food purposes; Potato flour; Powdered starch syrup; Processed cereal-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack for or ingredient for making other foods; Propolis for food purposes; Ready to eat, cereal derived food bars; Rice-based snack foods; Royal jelly for food purposes; Saffron for use as a food seasoning; Sago palm starch; Salt for preserving food; Seasoned coating mixtures for foods; Seasonings and flavorings for dog foods and cattle feed; Snack food chews made primarily from brown rice syrup; Starch syrup; Tapioca flour; Wheat flour; Wheat-based snack foods; Yeast extracts for food; Beverages made of coffee; Beverages made of tea; Candy containing alcoholic beverage content and flavor; Cocoa beverages with milk; Cocoa-based beverages; Coffee based beverages; Coffee beverages with milk; Coffee-based beverage containing milk; Coffee-based beverages; Flavorings for beverages; Grain-based beverages; Mixes in the nature of concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of tea based beverages; Prepared cocoa and cocoa-based beverages; Prepared coffee and coffee-based beverages; Scented water for flavoring beverages; Tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |