Drawing for (ONE)GINEERING

USPTO serial 77341713

(ONE)GINEERING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FISHER, HANNAH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with (ONE)GINEERING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bryce K. Earl, Esq.

BRYCE K. EARL, ESQ. SANTORO, DRIGGS, WALCH, KEARNEY, HOLLEY & THOMPSON400 S 4TH ST FL 3LAS VEGAS, NV 89101-6201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Engineering services; structural engineering for residential communities, warehouses, parking structures, offices, medical, retail, industrial, public, and educational facilities, hotels and high rises, pools, retaining walls, and specialty structures; mechanical engineering with respect to heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), energy code compliance and controls, and chilled water distribution systems; electrical engineering with respect to lighting design and control, power distribution, communication systems, emergency power systems; plumbing design services for waste, vent, hot and cold water distribution; civil engineering services, namely, due diligence reports, master plan development, golf course communities, grading plans, zone change entitlements, street plans and profiles, utility plans, sewer main extension plans, technical drainage studies, traffic studies, vacation applications, construction-phase services, and traffic signage and striping plans; survey and mapping services, namely, land title surveys, boundary surveys, boundary line adjustment maps, parcel maps, merger and re-subdivisions, topographic surveys, construction staking, finished floor certification, global positioning system (GPS), tentative subdivision maps, easement and encumbrance maps, and subdivision final maps; hydraulic engineering and design services with respect to drainage studies, network analysis, and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting; engineering services for public works with respect to roadways, water mains, reservoirs, channels and drainage facilities; water resources engineering, namely, the development of water resources and water quality; architectural design services; computer software and custom applications development and design services; environmental services, namely, review of standards and practices to assure compliance with environmental laws and regulations, and the assessment and analysis of energy usage, conservation, and supply for commercial, retail, industrial and public buildings and structures, and environmental and ecological survey services; computer software and custom applications development and design services; computer network design for others, namely, planning and design of master infrastructure for information technology systems; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; computer services, namely, software design, programming, maintenance, customization, updating and development; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; and urban planning servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 4, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 15, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 26, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 26, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 17, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 17, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Sep 17, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 17, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 17, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 18, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 6, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Dec 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance