USPTO serial 77341713
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryce K. Earl, Esq.
BRYCE K. EARL, ESQ. SANTORO, DRIGGS, WALCH, KEARNEY, HOLLEY & THOMPSON400 S 4TH ST FL 3LAS VEGAS, NV 89101-6201UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Engineering services; structural engineering for residential communities, warehouses, parking structures, offices, medical, retail, industrial, public, and educational facilities, hotels and high rises, pools, retaining walls, and specialty structures; mechanical engineering with respect to heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC), energy code compliance and controls, and chilled water distribution systems; electrical engineering with respect to lighting design and control, power distribution, communication systems, emergency power systems; plumbing design services for waste, vent, hot and cold water distribution; civil engineering services, namely, due diligence reports, master plan development, golf course communities, grading plans, zone change entitlements, street plans and profiles, utility plans, sewer main extension plans, technical drainage studies, traffic studies, vacation applications, construction-phase services, and traffic signage and striping plans; survey and mapping services, namely, land title surveys, boundary surveys, boundary line adjustment maps, parcel maps, merger and re-subdivisions, topographic surveys, construction staking, finished floor certification, global positioning system (GPS), tentative subdivision maps, easement and encumbrance maps, and subdivision final maps; hydraulic engineering and design services with respect to drainage studies, network analysis, and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting; engineering services for public works with respect to roadways, water mains, reservoirs, channels and drainage facilities; water resources engineering, namely, the development of water resources and water quality; architectural design services; computer software and custom applications development and design services; environmental services, namely, review of standards and practices to assure compliance with environmental laws and regulations, and the assessment and analysis of energy usage, conservation, and supply for commercial, retail, industrial and public buildings and structures, and environmental and ecological survey services; computer software and custom applications development and design services; computer network design for others, namely, planning and design of master infrastructure for information technology systems; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; computer services, namely, software design, programming, maintenance, customization, updating and development; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; and urban planning services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |