USPTO serial 77342124
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Lee Fraley
R. LEE FRALEY SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.1 ARIZONA CENTER 400 E VAN BURENPHOENIX, AZ 85004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Fireplaces; parts, accessories and attachments for fireplaces, namely, cast iron and ceramic gas surround inserts, cast iron, ceramic and glass plates, covers, ventilating louvers, brackets, burners, sold as parts of fireplaces; gas, wood burning and solid fuel burning stoves; parts, accessories and attachments for stoves, namely, cast iron and ceramic gas surround inserts, cast iron and ceramic plates, covers, ventilating louvers, brackets, burners, sold as parts of stoves | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |