Drawing for SUREFIRE

USPTO serial 77342124

SUREFIRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUREFIRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. Lee Fraley

R. LEE FRALEY SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.1 ARIZONA CENTER 400 E VAN BURENPHOENIX, AZ 85004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Fireplaces; parts, accessories and attachments for fireplaces, namely, cast iron and ceramic gas surround inserts, cast iron, ceramic and glass plates, covers, ventilating louvers, brackets, burners, sold as parts of fireplaces; gas, wood burning and solid fuel burning stoves; parts, accessories and attachments for stoves, namely, cast iron and ceramic gas surround inserts, cast iron and ceramic plates, covers, ventilating louvers, brackets, burners, sold as parts of stovesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 17, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 17, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 13, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 13, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Aug 14, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 13, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 15, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 15, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 15, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 14, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 7, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Dec 6, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance