Drawing for IREAD

USPTO serial 77342319

IREAD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VALLILLO, MELISSA C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IREAD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Colette A. Durst

Colette A. Durst Tyco Safety ProductsOne Town Center RoadIP Law DepartmentBoca Raton, FL 33486

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Inventory tracking, retail security and theft prevention systems, namely, signal splitters for electronic inventory tracking, retail security and theft prevention apparatus; junction boxes and electronic controllers for configuring, managing and controlling audio and video signals, radio signals, radio frequency identification (RFID) devices, retail security and theft prevention tags and labels, retail security and theft prevention sensors, radio transmitters and receivers, and antennas, all for use in inventory tracking, retail security and theft prevention systems; junction boxes for configuring and controlling electrical power distribution; computer software used for configuring, managing and controlling audio and video signals, radio signals, radio frequency identification (RFID) devices, retail security and theft prevention tags and labels, retail security and theft prevention sensors, radio transmitters and receivers, and antennas, all for use in inventory tracking, retail security and theft prevention systems; and user manuals sold as a unit with all the foregoing goodsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Oct 31, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Nov 15, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 15, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 8, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 8, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Mar 31, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Mar 12, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 12, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Sep 29, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 28, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Sep 28, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 9, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 9, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Feb 20, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 20, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 11, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 14, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 16, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 16, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 16, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 16, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 16, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 7, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Dec 6, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance