Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 77342688?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/77342688. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns CALIFORNIA GREEN CLEAN?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 77342688, the listed owner(s) include: Arthur, Angela D., CGC DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC.

What is USPTO serial number 77342688?

Serial number 77342688 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark CALIFORNIA GREEN CLEAN. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of CALIFORNIA GREEN CLEAN?

CALIFORNIA GREEN CLEAN (77342688) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover CALIFORNIA GREEN CLEAN?

The public record lists International Classes: 037. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 77342688

CALIFORNIA GREEN CLEAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Dec 3, 2007
Status date: Jun 10, 2011
Registration date: —
Examiner: CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CALIFORNIA GREEN CLEAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Arthur, Angela D.
Sacramento, CA
Other trademarks owned by Arthur, Angela D.
CGC DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC
SACRAMENTO, CA
Other trademarks owned by CGC DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
037	Janitorial services; Maid services	PARTIALLY PAID	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jul 1, 2011	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Jun 10, 2011	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Jun 10, 2011	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Mar 21, 2011	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
Oct 6, 2010	AUPC	AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
Oct 6, 2010	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Oct 4, 2010	IUAF	USE AMENDMENT FILED	—
Oct 4, 2010	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Sep 23, 2010	GNSN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Sep 23, 2010	GNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Sep 23, 2010	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Aug 4, 2010	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jun 9, 2010	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jun 2, 2010	ASCK	ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	—
May 27, 2010	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Mar 31, 2010	ASGN	AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP	—
Dec 16, 2009	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Dec 16, 2009	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 16, 2009	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 27, 2009	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Nov 27, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 25, 2009	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
May 19, 2009	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2009	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2009	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2009	RFTP	REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS	—
Apr 27, 2009	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Apr 27, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Apr 24, 2009	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Apr 24, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Apr 23, 2009	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Apr 23, 2009	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Oct 20, 2008	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2008	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2008	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Sep 21, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 21, 2008	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Sep 15, 2008	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Mar 17, 2008	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2008	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2008	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Dec 6, 2007	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—