Drawing for CALIFORNIA GREEN CLEAN

USPTO serial 77342688

CALIFORNIA GREEN CLEAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CALIFORNIA GREEN CLEAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Janitorial services; Maid servicesPARTIALLY PAID—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 10, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 10, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 21, 2011EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 6, 2010AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 6, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 4, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2010GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2010GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2010CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 4, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 9, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 2, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 27, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 31, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 16, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 16, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 16, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 27, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2009RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Apr 27, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 15, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance