USPTO serial 77343357
FITZGERALD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FITZGERALD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
STEPHEN L. BAKER BAKER AND RANNELLS, PA575 ROUTE 28 STE 102RARITAN, NJ 08869-1354UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Blusher; Eye make-up; Body powder; Concealers for SKIN; Face and body beauty creams; Face powder; Make-up for the face and body; Lipstick; Lip balm; Lip gloss; Lip liner; Foundation make-up; Make-up; Make-up powder; Nail polish; Body sprays; Room fragrances; Scented linen sprays; Incense sticks; Fragrances for personal use; Oils for toiletry purposes; Bath beads; Potpourri; Perfuming sachets; Sachet-like eye pillows containing fragrances; Sachets; Scented body lotions and creams; Scented body spray; Scented ceramic stones; Scented fabric refresher spray; Scented oils used to produce aromas when heated; Scented room sprays; Aromatherapy oils; Baby oil; Bath oil; Body oil; Cosmetic oils; Essential oils; Perfume oils; Tanning oils; Emery boards; Cologne; After-shave; After-shave balms; After-shave creams; After-shave emulsions; After-shave gel; After-shave lotions; After-sun lotions; Aromatherapy lotions; Bath lotion; Bathing lotions; Body lotion; Cosmetic suntan lotions; Face and body lotions; Hair waving lotion; Hand lotions; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners and peels; Styling lotions; Beauty creams; Body cream; Cosmetic creams; Exfoliant creams; Face and body creams; Pre-shave creams; Shaving balm; Shaving cream; Shaving gel; Shaving preparations; Skin cream; Bath soaps; Deodorant soap; Deodorant for personal use; Shampoos; Bath gel; Hair gel; Hair styling spray; Shower and bath gel; Beauty lotions; Eau de perfume; Perfume; Eau de toilette; Deodorants for body care | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | Candles; Perfumed candles; Fragrant wax for use in potpourri burners; Scented candles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |