USPTO serial 77344030
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
LOS ALTOS, CA
Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph V. Myers III
KENNETH L WILTON SEYFARTH SHAW LLP2029 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 3500LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3021UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer Software, namely, software development tools; computer software for tracking changes and modifications to software and for managing software development projects; computer software, namely, application interfaces, plugins, and protocol interfaces and computer software development tools for design and development of open-source and proprietary software programs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2007 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | CCCN | COUNTERCLAIM CANC. NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 2016 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 16, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 2013 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 2013 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 3, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 16, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |