Drawing for ASCEND SHOULDER SYSTEM

USPTO serial 77348118

ASCEND SHOULDER SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RHIM, ANDREW
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASCEND SHOULDER SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

B. Frank Davis

B. FRANK DAVIS BERNARD, CASSISA, ELLIOTT & DAVIS1615 METAIRIE RDMETAIRIE, LA 70005-3974UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical and surgical apparatus and instruments, namely, orthopedic fixation device used in orthopedic transplant and/or implant surgeryACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2009PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Feb 17, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Feb 2, 2009PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Feb 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 15, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 14, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 18, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 13, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance