USPTO serial 77368534
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Davis, II
JAMES R. DAVIS, II ARENT FOX LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, NWARENT FOX LLPWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5399| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and promotion services in the field of patents; sales promotion services in the field of patents; promotion of business opportunities in the field of patents; advertising and promotion services in the field of technology; sales promotion services in the field of technology; promotion of business opportunities in the field of technology; advertising and promotion services in the field of branding; sales promotion services in the field of branding; promotion of business opportunities in the field of branding; promoting the brand identity of others; trademark agency services, namely trademark monitoring services; advertising and promotion services in the field of patents provided via the Internet; sales promotion services in the field of patents provided via the Internet; promotion of business opportunities in the field of patents via the Internet; advertising and promotion services in the field of technology provided via the Internet; sales promotion services in the field of technology provided via the Internet; promotion of business opportunities in the field of technology via the Internet; advertising and promotion services in the field of branding provided via the Internet; sales promotion services in the field of branding provided via the Internet; promotion of business opportunities in the field of branding via the Internet; promoting the brand identity of others via the Internet; trademark agency services, namely trademark monitoring services, provided via the Internet; advisory, information and consultancy services relating to advertising and promotion services in the field of patents; advisory, information and consultancy services relating to sales promotion services in the field of patents; advisory, information and consultancy services relating to promotion of business opportunities in the field of patents; advisory, information and consultancy services relating to advertising and promotion services in the field of technology; advisory, information and consultancy services relating to sales promotion services in the field of technology; advisory, information and consultancy services relating to promotion of business opportunities in the field of technology; advisory, information and consultancy services relating to advertising and promotion services in the field of branding; advisory, information and consultancy services relating to sales promotion services in the field of branding; advisory, information and consultancy services relating to promotion of business opportunities in the field of branding; advisory, information and consultancy services relating to promoting the brand identity of others; advisory, information and consultancy services relating to trademark monitoring services; online advisory, information and consultancy services relating to advertising and promotion services in the field of patents; online advisory, information and consultancy services relating to sales promotion services in the field of patents; online advisory, information and consultancy services relating to promotion of business opportunities in the field of patents; online advisory, information and consultancy services relating to advertising and promotion services in the field of technology; online advisory, information and consultancy services relating to sales promotion services in the field of technology; online advisory, information and consultancy services relating to promotion of business opportunities in the field of technology; online advisory, information and consultancy services relating to advertising and promotion services in the field of branding; online advisory, information and consultancy services relating to sales promotion services in the field of branding; online advisory, information and consultancy services relating to promotion of business opportunities in the field of branding; online advisory, information and consultancy services relating to promoting the brand identity of others; online advisory, information and consultancy services relating to trademark monitoring services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Legal services; patent agency services; professional advisory services relating to patents; intellectual property licensing services; trademark agency services, namely legal services in the nature of trademark enforcement, trademark searching, trademark clearance, trademark maintenance, trademark watching and the preparation and prosecution of trademark applications and oppositions; professional advisory services relating to trademark enforcement, trademark searching, trademark clearance, trademark maintenance, trademark watching and the preparation and prosecution of trademark applications and oppositions; legal services provided via the Internet; patent agency services provided via the Internet; professional advisory services relating to patents provided via the Internet; intellectual property licensing services provided via the Internet; trademark agency services provided via the Internet, namely legal services in the nature of trademark enforcement, trademark searching, trademark clearance, trademark maintenance, trademark watching and the preparation and prosecution of trademark applications and oppositions; professional advisory services relating to trademark enforcement, trademark searching, trademark clearance, trademark maintenance, trademark watching and the preparation and prosecution of trademark applications and oppositions provided via the Internet; information and consultancy services relating to legal services, patent agency services and professional advisory services relating to patents; information and consultancy services relating to legal and professional advisory services in the nature of trademark enforcement, trademark searching, trademark clearance, trademark maintenance, trademark watching and the preparation and prosecution of trademark applications and oppositions; information and consultancy services relating to intellectual property licensing services; online information and consultancy services relating to legal services, patent agency services and professional advisory services relating to patents; online information and consultancy services relating to legal and professional advisory services in the nature of trademark enforcement, trademark searching, trademark clearance, trademark maintenance, trademark watching and the preparation and prosecution of trademark applications and oppositions; online information and consultancy services relating to intellectual property licensing services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |