USPTO serial 77368865
VITALA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4348421Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 11, 2013
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VITALA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ABBOTSFORD, CA
ABBOTSFORD, CA
Abbotsford, BC, CA
Abbotsford, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George F. Kondor
George F. Kondor Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala LLP601 West Cordova StreetSuite 480 - The StationVancouver BC, V6B1G1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | dairy products, namely, milk, flavoured milk, milk beverages with high milk content, eggnog, cream, whipping cream, sour cream, cheese and yogurt, not sold for use in the industrial production of food products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VITALA FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VITALA FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Nutrifood Solutions Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Nutrifood Solutions Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named VITALA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 11, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 8, 2013 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| May 8, 2013 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2013 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 13, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 10, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 18, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 12, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 22, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 18, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 20, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |