USPTO serial 77374452
TECHSELECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4118809Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 27, 2012
- Examiner
- ROBERTSON, DEIRDRE G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TECHSELECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bay City, MI
Bay City, MI
Bay City, MI
ASSOCIATION OF INDEPENDENT OIL DISTRIBUTORS
MONTROSE, CO
Other trademarks owned by ASSOCIATION OF INDEPENDENT OIL DISTRIBUTORS
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jenifer S. McIntosh
Jenifer McIntosh Thomas P. Howard LLC842 W. S. Boulder Rd.Suite 100Louisville, CO 80027Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Automotive fluids, namely, antifreeze; automotive chemicals in liquid form, namely, windshield washer de-icing solvent, brake fluid, and power steering fluid | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 2, 2001 |
| 002 | Automotive aftermarket parts, namely, undercoating for vehicle chassis and body panels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 10, 2002 |
| 003 | Automotive chemicals in liquid form, namely, windshield washer cleaning solvent, brake cleaner; and automotive chemicals in aerosol form, namely, vehicle carpet cleaner, glass cleaner, spot remover, carburetor spray, and fuel injector throttle body cleaner; industrial and general purpose janitorial supplies, namely, cleaning preparations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 30, 2008 |
| 004 | Automotive, industrial, and general purpose lubricants, namely, gear lubricants for automobiles, gear lubricants for industrial machinery, general purpose gear lubricants, industrial way lubricants and general purpose way lubricants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 2, 2001 |
| 016 | Industrial and general purpose paper goods, namely, paper towels, paper hand-towels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2010 |
| 037 | Automotive services, namely, carwashes, appearance detailing, and vehicle undercoating | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 10, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rowley Brothers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Rowley Brothers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Rowley Brothers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ASSOCIATION OF INDEPENDENT OIL DISTRIBUTORS
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named TECHSELECT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2018 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2018 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 24, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 28, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 26, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |