USPTO serial 77375910
BIEDERMANN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3741548Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 26, 2010
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIEDERMANN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VS-Schwenningen, DE
VS-Schwenningen, DE
BIEDERMANN TECHNOLOGIES GMBH & CO. KG
DONAUESCHINGEN, DE
Other trademarks owned by BIEDERMANN TECHNOLOGIES GMBH & CO. KG
VS-Schwenningen, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical devices and instruments for medical, dental and veterinary use for skeletal, spinal, joint and trauma surgery; artificial limbs, eyes and teeth; orthopedic articles, namely, orthopedic implants, implants for spines, for skeletons, for bones all made of artificial material; suture materials | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Advertising; business management, in particular business management and organisation consultancy, professional business consultancy, business management consultancy, personnel management, commercial or industrial management assistance, business organisation consultancy, business management and organisation consultancy; advisory services for business management; business administration; providing office functions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | Insurance, in particular insurance consultancy, insurance brokerage, insurance information; financial affairs and monetary affairs, in particular financial consultancy, surety services, providing loans, financial analysis, financial information, financial sponsorship of research and of start-up companies, financial evaluation, financing services, mutual funds and capital investments, credit bureaux, financial management also trusteeship representatives; monetary affairs, namely, monetary exchange; real estate affairs, in particular real estate agencies, real estate management, leasing of real estate, real estate appraisal, rental of offices and renting of flats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific research and development of technology in the field of surgery and orthopedics in particular in the field of orthopedic implants, implants for spines, for skeletons or bones and research services in the field of surgery and orthopedics, in particular in the field of orthopedic implants, implants for spines, for skeletons or bones and design services relating thereto; medical and scientific industrial analysis and research services in the field of surgery and orthopedics, in particular in the field of orthopedic implants, implants for spines, for skeletons or bones | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Biedermann Motech GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Biedermann Motech GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by BIEDERMANN TECHNOLOGIES GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Biedermann Motech GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BIEDERMANN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 31, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 18, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |