USPTO serial 77377372
WHO HAS THE BIGGEST BRAIN?
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3928869Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 8, 2011
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WHO HAS THE BIGGEST BRAIN??
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London, GB
GUILDFORD, SURREY, GB
GUILDFORD, SURREY, GB
GUILDFORD, SURREY, GB
GUILDFORD, SURREY, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kerry Hopkins
KERRY HOPKINS ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.209 REDWOOD SHORES PKWYREDWOOD CITY, CA 94065-1175UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | interactive game software; computer game software; game software for use on electronic communication devices, namely, mobile telephones | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 2009 |
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, providing social games through on-line means | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Playfish Limited
- Other trademarks owned by ELECTRONIC ARTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by ELECTRONIC ARTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by ELECTRONIC ARTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by ELECTRONIC ARTS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named WHO HAS THE BIGGEST BRAIN?
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | ZZAX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-TIMELY AAU | — |
| May 28, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 19, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |