USPTO serial 77377814
LEFT COAST ORGANICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEFT COAST ORGANICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Burnaby, British Colombia, CA
Burnaby, British Colombia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allyn Taylor
HEATHER A. DUNN DLA PIPER LLP US555 MISSION STREET, SUITE 2400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2933UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ike Enterprises Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Ike Enterprises Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named LEFT COAST ORGANICS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 2, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 18, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2017 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 16, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2015 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 1, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |