USPTO serial 77378122
JENACLIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 13, 2011
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with JENACLIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
IRVINE, CA
Munich, DE
Munich, DE
Munich, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David I. Greenbaum
David I. Greenbaum Fox Rothschild LLP997 Lenox Drive, Building 3Lawrenceville, NJ 08648-2311UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Natural and biologic valves for vascular implantation; Natural and biologic valves for internal vascular patient use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 006 | Packaging for medical and veterinary apparatus, namely, packaging made from metallic foil | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Artificial valves and artificial cardiac valves for vascular implantation, and parts and fittings therefor; artificial valves and artificial cardiac valves for internal vascular patient use, and parts and fittings therefor; stents, and parts and fittings therefor; artificial stents, and parts and fittings therefor; artificial cardiac valves, and parts and fittings therefor; cardiac stents, and parts and fittings therefor; cardiac valve replacement apparatus, and parts and fittings therefor; aortic valve repair and replacement apparatus, and parts and fittings therefor; aortic valve replacement stents, and parts and fittings therefor; and structural parts therefor | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Medical and veterinary publications, namely, print presentations, medical journals and veterinary journals and a series of articles therefor; printed visuals in the nature of promotional literature, presentations, and brochures; packaging for medical and veterinary apparatus, namely, packaging made from paper, cardboard, and combinations thereof; printed matter for use with medical and veterinary apparatus, namely, instructional leaflets and information sheets, and brochures | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Providing online non-downloadable medical and veterinary educational presentations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Provision of medical and veterinary information, namely, medical and veterinary information regarding cardiac procedures; provision of information relating to surgical procedures; medical and veterinary services relating to cardiac valve replacement; conducting surgical procedures, namely, cardiac valve replacement and repair surgery; provision of information relating to suturing; medical and veterinary suturing services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JEANVALVE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by JenaValve Technology GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by JenaValve Technology GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by JenaValve Technology GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named JENACLIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 17, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 21, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 9, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |