USPTO serial 77378193
LENS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3684924Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 22, 2009
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LENS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London, GB
LONDON, GB
London, GB
London, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John H. Weber
JOHN H. WEBER BAKER & HOSTETLER1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Articles of clothing, namely, coats, jackets, winter jackets, suntops, pants, shirts, pedal pusher pants, trousers, skirts, dresses, sundresses, shorts, vests, tops, cardigans, camisoles, jeans, T-shirts, tunics, sarongs, swimsuits, bikinis, blouses, cycle shorts, leggings, jog pants, clam digger pants, skirt-trouser combinations, brassieres, underwear, briefs, suspenders, wraps, robes pajamas, nightshirts, raincoats, blazers, suits, jumpers, sweatshirts; footwear; boots; shoes; slippers; sandals; hosiery; socks; stockings; tights; headgear, namely, caps, hats; berets; belts; gloves; mittens; scarves; shawls | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring clothing; the bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a variety of clothing, footwear, hair accessories, bags, millinery, jewelry, imitation jewelry, watches, and/or sporting clothing enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods; the bringing together, for the benefit of others, of pictorial images of footwear, hair accessories, bags, millinery, jewelry, imitation jewelry, watches, and/or sporting clothing in the form of a presentation, enabling customers conveniently to view and to purchase those goods through a television shopping channel; the bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a variety of descriptions of, or pictorial images of clothing, goods in a clothing and clothing accessories catalog, enabling customers conveniently to view and to purchase those goods by mail order; the bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a variety of descriptions of, or pictorial images of, goods from a clothing and clothing accessories Internet website, enabling customers to conveniently view and to purchase those goods by means of telecommunications; provision of consumer information to customers and advice and assistance in the selection of clothing and clothing accessories; business services being customer service desks, namely, providing customer service and product inquiry services via telephone and e-mail for others; window dressing; arranging window displays; business administration consulting; advertising and promotional services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Arcadia Group Brands Limited
- Other trademarks owned by TOP SHOP/TOP MAN LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Arcadia Group Brands Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Arcadia Group Brands Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named LENS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 26, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 17, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Oct 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |