USPTO serial 77379073
ZABRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZABRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Household containers for kimchi; nests of food boxes; household containers for foodstuffs; thermally insulated containers for food; lunch boxes; mess-tins; household containers for kimchi having an inner lid to fix kimchi; household containers for food having an inner lid to fix food | ABANDONED | — |
| 029 | Kimchi; white-radish kimchi; chopped radishes pickled in salt water; fermented vegetable foods; Sauerkraut; Sliced vegetables preserved in soy sauce soybean paste; gherkins; processed vegetables; vegetable salads; pickles; salted vegetables; preserved vegetables; crystallized fruits; salted fruits; seasoned pickles; cooked vegetables; tinned or bottled fruits; tinned or bottled vegetables; tinned tomatoes | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | Retail store services, wholesale distributorship services and import/export agency services in the field of kimchi; retail store services, wholesale distributorship services and import/export agency services in the field of containers for kimchi/tableware/containers for foodstuffs/salted vegetable/fermented vegetable foods/processed vegetable food/preserved vegetables/processed fruit food/preserved fruit; online retail store services, wholesale distributorship services and import/export agency services in the field of kimchi; online retail store services, wholesale distributorship services and import/export agency services in the field of containers for kimchi/tableware/containers for foodstuffs/salted vegetable/fermented vegetable foods/processed vegetable food/preserved vegetables/ processed fruit food/preserved fruit | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jang Chung Dong Wang Jok Bal Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Jang Chung Dong Wang Jok Bal Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named ZABRA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 27, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |