USPTO serial 77379624
AB APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4070856Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 13, 2011
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AB APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Foster City, CA
FOSTER CITY, CA
FOSTER CITY, CA
FOSTER CITY, CA
FOSTER CITY, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Phil Makrogiannis
Phil Makrogiannis Life Technologies Corporation5791 Van Allen WayCarlsbad, CA 92008UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consultation and research services in the field of biotechnology, genetic analysis, and life science; product development for others; laboratory services, namely, nucleic acid sequencing, analysis and synthesis of oligonucleotides and other molecules for others for use in life science research and biotechnology research; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software used for collection, storage, organization, analysis, integration and communication of scientific data or operate laboratory instrument; genetic disease research, genomics and gene expression research and development; pharmacokinetic research services; proteomics research services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 10, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Applera Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AB APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 23, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 4, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 9, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |