USPTO serial 77380561
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
St. James City, FL
St. James City, FL
St. James City, FL
St. James City, FL
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Construction services, namely, commercial and residential site development, namely, planning and laying out of commercial and residential communities, septic system installation, septic system repair, septic pumpouts, installation and repair of grease traps, pumpout of grease traps, residential and commercial grading, namely, construction grading services, paving, namely, brick paving, paving contractor services, and road paving, mining extraction, installation of culverts, installation of underground utilities, excavating, demolition services, namely, the demolition of buildings and construction services, namely, curbing driveways, namely, the pouring of concrete for the formation of curbs for the perimeter of parking lots at commercial sites | ABANDONED | Apr 30, 1997 |
| 039 | Rental of garbage cans for construction clean up; delivery of fill dirt and other fill materials and crane rental and leasing for loading and unloading purposes | ABANDONED | Apr 30, 1997 |
| 044 | Landscaping services, namely, the installation of sod, mulch, and plants and land clearing, namely, tree removal | ABANDONED | Apr 30, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |