USPTO serial 77382504
WALKS & WALLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WALKS & WALLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Midland, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services featuring building products and supplies, concrete products, landscaping products, and home improvement products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 18, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |