USPTO serial 77382714
MIAMI DEVICE SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 13, 2010
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with MIAMI DEVICE SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Plumley
David A. Plumley LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLPPO BOX 29001GLENDALE, CA 91209-9001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | [ (Based on 44(e)) SURGICAL IMPLANTS, NAMELY, ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS, IMPLANTS FOR SPINES, FOR SKELETONS, AND FOR BONES, ALL COMPRISING LIVING TISSUE ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | [ (Based on Use in Commerce) SURGICAL DEVICES AND INSTRUMENTS FOR DENTAL, AND VETERINARY USE; SUTURE MATERIALS (Based on 44(e)) SURGICAL DEVICES AND INSTRUMENTS FOR DENTAL, AND VETERINARY USE; SUTURE MATERIALS * (BASED ON USE IN COMMERCE) SURGICAL DEVICES AND INSTRUMENTS FOR MEDICAL USE; ORTHOPEDIC ARTICLES, NAMELY, ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS, IMPLANTS FOR SPINES, FOR SKELETONS, AND FOR BONES, ALL COMPRISING ARTIFICIAL MATERIAL (BASED ON 44(E)) SURGICAL DEVICES AND INSTRUMENTS FOR MEDICAL USE; ORTHOPEDIC ARTICLES, NAMELY, ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS, IMPLANTS FOR SPINES, FOR SKELETONS, AND FOR BONES, ALL COMPRISING ARTIFICIAL MATERIAL; SURGICAL DEVICES AND INSTRUMENTS FOR DENTAL, AND VETERINARY USE; SUTURE MATERIALS * ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Dec 22, 2009 |
| 035 | [ (Based on 44(e)) MARKETING CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF SURGICAL AND ORTHOPEDIC APPARATUS, NAMELY, FOR ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS, IMPLANTS FOR THE SPINE, IMPLANTS FOR SKELETONS AND BONES; DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES FOR SURGICAL AND ORTHOPEDIC INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, SALES MANAGEMENT AND SALES PROMOTION SERVICES FOR SURGICAL AND ORTHOPEDIC APPARATUS, NAMELY, FOR ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS, IMPLANTS FOR THE SPINE, IMPLANTS FOR SKELETONS AND BONES ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | (Based on Use in Commerce) FABRICATION OF PROTOTYPES OF NEW PRODUCTS FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, MANUFACTURING TO THE ORDER AND SPECIFICATION OF OTHERS OF SURGICAL DEVICES AND INSTRUMENTS FOR MEDICAL USE, AND ORTHOPEDIC ARTICLES, NAMELY, ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS, IMPLANTS FOR SPINES, FOR SKELETONS AND BONES [ (Based on 44(e)) FABRICATION OF PROTOTYPES OF NEW PRODUCTS FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, MANUFACTURING TO THE ORDER AND SPECIFICATION OF OTHERS OF SURGICAL DEVICES AND INSTRUMENTS FOR DENTAL AND VETERINARY USE ] | ACTIVE | Dec 22, 2009 |
| 042 | [ (Based on Use in Commerce) SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, IN THE FIELD OF SURGERY AND ORTHOPEDICS, IN PARTICULAR, IN THE FIELD OF ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS, IMPLANTS FOR SPINES, FOR SKELETONS OR BONES, AND RESEARCH SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF SURGERY AND ORTHOPEDICS, IN PARTICULAR, IN THE FIELD ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS, IMPLANTS FOR SPINES, FOR SKELETONS OR BONES, AND DESIGN SERVICES RELATING THERETO; MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF SURGERY AND ORTHOPEDICS, IN PARTICULAR, IN THE INDUSTRIES OF ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS, IMPLANTS FOR SPINES, FOR SKELETONS OR BONES; SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL SERVICES, NAMELY, RESEARCH, DESIGN AND TESTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF HIGH PRECISION METALLIC PARTS AND COMPONENTS FOR THE MEDICAL AND SURGICAL SECTORS; MEDICAL PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING SERVICES (Based on 44(e)) SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL SERVICES, NAMELY, RESEARCH, DESIGN AND TESTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF HIGH PRECISION METALLIC PARTS AND COMPONENTS FOR THE AUTOMOTIVE, AIRCRAFT AND PRECISION ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES SECTORS ] * (BASED ON USE IN COMMERCE) SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, IN THE FIELD OF SURGERY AND ORTHOPEDICS, IN PARTICULAR, IN THE FIELD OF ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS, IMPLANTS FOR SPINES, FOR SKELETONS OR BONES, AND RESEARCH SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF SURGERY AND ORTHOPEDICS, IN PARTICULAR, IN THE FIELD OF ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS, IMPLANTS FOR SPINES, FOR SKELETONS OR BONES, AND DESIGN SERVICES RELATING THERETO; MEDICAL AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF SURGERY AND ORTHOPEDICS, IN PARTICULAR, IN THE INDUSTRIES OF ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANTS, IMPLANTS FOR SPINES, FOR SKELETONS OR BONES; SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL SERVICES, NAMELY, RESEARCH, DESIGN AND TESTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF HIGH PRECISION METALLIC PARTS AND COMPONENTS FOR THE MEDICAL AND SURGICAL SECTORS; MEDICAL PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING SERVICES [ (BASED ON 44(E)) SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL SERVICES, NAMELY, RESEARCH, DESIGN AND TESTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF HIGH PRECISION METALLIC PARTS AND COMPONENTS FOR THE AUTOMOTIVE, AIRCRAFT AND PRECISION ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES SECTORS * ] | ACTIVE | Dec 22, 2009 |
| 044 | [ (Based on 44(e)) MEDICAL SERVICES, SURGICAL SERVICES, ORTHOPEDIC SERVICES; VETERINARY SERVICES ] [ * (BASED ON USE IN COMMERCE) MEDICAL SERVICES, SURGICAL SERVICES, ORTHOPEDIC SERVICES, ] [ VETERINARY SERVICES ] [ * ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BIEDERMANN, MARKKU
- Other trademarks owned by BIEDERMANN, MARKKU
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named MIAMI DEVICE SOLUTIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2021 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 5, 2021 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 12, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 13, 2017 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 10, 2017 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | C7P. | CANCELLED SEC. 7 - PARTIAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 10, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2016 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | C7PF | RQST FOR SECT 7 PARTIAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2016 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2016 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |