USPTO serial 77383887
LE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vocklabruck, AT
Vocklabruck, AT
Kremsmunster, AT
Kremsmunster, AT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietetic food products for medical purposes; food for babies | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | Beers, mineral waters and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, aerated fruit juices, drinking water, flavored waters, fruit beverages, fruit flavored soft drinks, herbal juices, isotonic drinks, lemonade, non-alcoholic aperitifs and non-alcoholic cocktail mixes; fruit drinks and fruit juices, energy drinks, syrups and other preparations for making beverages, namely, concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of soft drinks, essences for use in making soft drinks not in the nature of essential oils, and powders used in the preparation of isotonic sport drinks and sport beverages | ABANDONED | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, excluding beer, namely, alcoholic beverages of fruit, alcoholic cocktail mixes, alcoholic egg nog, alcoholic punch, aperitifs, distilled spirits, liqueurs, sparkling wines and wines | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Reiter, Heinz
- Other trademarks owned by Reiter, Heinz
- Other trademarks owned by Bierbaumer, Hans-Peter
- Other trademarks owned by Bierbaumer, Hans-Peter
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named LE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |