USPTO serial 77385261
BRIGHT AUTOMOTIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRIGHT AUTOMOTIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Automobiles and structural parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BRIGHT AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Solution System Partners, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Solution System Partners, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named BRIGHT AUTOMOTIVE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 31, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 30, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 19, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |