USPTO serial 77390839
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan S. Jackson
SUSAN S. JACKSON KENNEDY COVINGTON LOBDELL & HICKMAN, LLP214 NORTH TRYON STREETHEARST TOWER, 47TH FLOORCHARLOTTE, NC 28202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | whitening and deodorant soap; whitening cream for face, neck, hand and body; whitening lotion for face, neck, hand and body; toner; whitening facial scrub; whitening scrub for neck, hand and body; whitening facial wash; whitening wash for neck, hand and body; whitening facial cleanser; whitening facial cleanser for neck, hand and body; sun block creams; sunscreen lotions and gels; whitening facial soap, namely, germicidal, moisturizing, mild and deep cleasing, anti-pimple, acne-prone; whitening clay mask; anti-aging, anti-wrinkle, whitening exfoliating facial wash; skin whitening neutralizing gels, creams, lotions; skin whitening for underarm, stretch marks, nape elbows, knees, heels and buttocks; bleaching bar soap; medicated astringents; body and hand spa treatment; whitening milk lotion, cream for face, neck, hand and body; whitening bath foams and gels | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | food supplements | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |