USPTO serial 77391921
HIGGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 16, 2010
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with HIGGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CITY OF DOVER, DE
RUIZHANG TECHNOLOGY LIMITED COMPANY
SHANGHAI, CN
Other trademarks owned by RUIZHANG TECHNOLOGY LIMITED COMPANY
Morgan Hill, CA
Morgan Hill, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter B. Bromaghim
Peter B. Bromaghim Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP12400 Wilshire BoulevardSuite 700LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1019Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; electronic apparatus consisting of inventory integrated circuits which use radio frequency to communicate information to computers and other electronic devices; integrated circuits; computer chips; semiconductors; computer chipsets for use in transmitting data to and from a central processing unit; electronic sensors for detecting radio frequencies; semi-conductor memories; electronic transmitters, receivers and processors of radio frequency waves and emissions; microprocessors, microprocessor cores; computer hardware, namely, macro cells; and user manuals, data sheets, brochures, and informational flyers all in electronic format, relating to all of the aforementioned goods and sold as a unit | ACTIVE | Aug 19, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALIEN TECHNOLOGY, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by RUIZHANG TECHNOLOGY LIMITED COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by Alien Technology Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Alien Technology Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named HIGGS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 12, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 12, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 31, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 11, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |