Drawing for DIRECTVIEW

USPTO serial 77392980

DIRECTVIEW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIRECTVIEW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Takehiko Suzuki

TAKEHIKO SUZUKI DIRECTV, INC2230 E IMPERIAL HWYEL SEGUNDO, CA 90245-3531UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed reports, magazine, newsletter publications and books, containing television programming, media advertising and media research and analysis dealing with demographic information, media rating information, Internet and/or computer usage information, and product purchase and usage information in connection with the listening, viewing and usage habits of signal receiving audiences, Internet users and/or computer usersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 15, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 14, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 14, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Feb 16, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 16, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 18, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Sep 13, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 19, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 19, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 11, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 7, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 31, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 16, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 16, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 19, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 19, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 17, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 17, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 17, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 17, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 17, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 16, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 16, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 16, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 14, 2008MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Feb 13, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance