USPTO serial 77405845
DUCTZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3533563Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 18, 2008
- Examiner
- MADDEN, ANNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DUCTZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BIRMINGHAM, MI
Birmingham, MI
Birmingham, MI
Birmingham, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeremy D. Bisdorf
JEREMY D. BISDORF JAFFE, RAITT, HEUER & WEISS, P.C.535 W. William St., Suite 400SAnn Arbor, MI 48103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Asbestos removal; Cleaning of commercial premises; Cleaning of industrial premises; Cleaning of residential houses; Environmental consulting services, namely, consulting services related to asbestos removal, cleaning of commercial premises, cleaning of industrial premises and cleaning of residential houses; Fire remediation services, namely, cleaning and restoration of commercial and industrial premises and residential houses; Hazardous materials emergency response remediation services, namely, disposal of hazardous materials; HVAC contractor services; Water damage remediation services, namely, cleaning and restoration of commercial and industrial premises and residential houses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 30, 2003 |
| 040 | Air deodorizing; Air purification; Chemical remediation services; Decontamination of hazardous materials; Environmental consulting services, namely, consulting services related to air deodorizing, air purification, chemical remediation services, decontamination of hazardous materials, first response air quality restoration and mold remediation services; Environmental remediation services, namely, air quality restoration; First response air quality restoration services; Hazardous materials emergency response remediation services, namely, containment and decontamination of hazardous materials; Mold remediation services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 30, 2003 |
| 042 | Air quality testing; Chemical, biochemical, biological and bacteriological research and analysis; Environmental consulting services, namely, engineering services for building and property condition assessment, repair and restoration, building monitoring and environmental consulting; Environmental testing and inspection services; Environmental testing and inspection services; Evaluation and testing of buildings for the presence of hazardous materials | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 30, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BELFOR FRANCHISE GROUP LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Ductz Holdings LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Ductz Holdings LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Ductz Holdings LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DUCTZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |