Drawing for DINNER? DONE!

USPTO serial 77408380

DINNER? DONE!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HETZEL, DANNEAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DINNER? DONE!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy J. Zarley

TIMOTHY J. ZARLEY ZARLEY LAW FIRM, P.L.C.400 LOCUST STREETCAPITAL SQUARE, SUITE 200DES MOINES, IA 50309-2350

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational demonstrations, namely, meal preparationACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 17, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 17, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 2, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Mar 19, 2009GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Mar 19, 2009GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Mar 19, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Jan 29, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 28, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 28, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Dec 4, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Dec 4, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 12, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 5, 2008MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Mar 4, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance