Drawing for ZUI

USPTO serial 77411887

ZUI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZUI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jorge Arciniega

Jorge Arciniega McDermott Will & Emery LLP2049 Century Park EastSuite 3800Los Angeles, CA 90067-3218

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for creating, customizing, manipulating, displaying, using, and storing digital avatars for use online and with online computer software games, online web-based community environments, messaging, and for delivery to and use on various platforms and media, namely, computers, computer networks, mobile phones, mobile devices, handheld computers, and electronic devicesACTIVE
042Providing a website and web-based access to online non-downloadable software that allows computer users to create, customize, manipulate, display, use, store and purchase digital avatars for use online and with online computer software games, online web-based community environments, messaging, and for delivery to and use on various platforms and media, including computers, computer networks, mobile phones, mobile devices, handheld computers, and electronic devices; Maintenance of online computer software gaming, web-based community environments, and electronic game services featuring digital avatars for entertainment purposes, by means of the Internet or other computer or telecommunication networks, wireless communications network or a computer-based systemACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 6, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 19, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 18, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Feb 27, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Feb 27, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 29, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 28, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 26, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 26, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 15, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 14, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 14, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Feb 6, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Feb 4, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 4, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 1, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 4, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 10, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 10, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jun 1, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 28, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 2, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Apr 30, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 30, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 30, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
Feb 13, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Aug 10, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Aug 8, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Aug 8, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jan 26, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 23, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 11, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 11, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 10, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 10, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jul 10, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 9, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 9, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 9, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 9, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jan 9, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jan 9, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 18, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 17, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 17, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 6, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance