USPTO serial 77413161
BASKETBALL PERFORMANCE CENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BASKETBALL PERFORMANCE CENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Davenport, IA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay R. Hamilton
JAY R. HAMILTON LAW OFFICE OF JAY R. HAMILTON, PLC.331 W 3RD ST.NVC SUITE 120DAVENPORT, IA 52801Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Conducting educational exhibitions in the nature of basketball; Education information; Encouraging amateur sports and physical education by organizing, promoting, sponsoring, sanctioning, conducting, administering, regulating and governing amateur athletic programs and activities; Entertainment services, namely, arranging and conducting of competitions for basketball; Physical education; Physical education services; Providing educational mentoring services and programs in the field of basketball; Education services, namely, mentoring in the field of basketball; Education services, namely, one-on-one mentoring in the field of basketball; Education services, namely, providing live and on-line teaching, assistance and analysis in the field of basketball; Education services, namely, providing tutorial sessions in the field(s) of basketball; Education services, namely, providing high intensity skill based instruction in the field of basketball; Educational and entertainment services, namely, a continuing program about basketball accessible by radio, television, satellite, audio, video and computer networks; Educational services in the nature of basketball schools | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |