USPTO serial 77415519
KLEAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KLEAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Hollywood, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Day
Christopher J. Day Law Office of Christopher Day9977 North 90th Street, Suite 155Scottsdale, AZ 85258UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS; OILS, NAMELY, BATH OIL, MASSAGE OIL, PERFUME OIL; SCRUBS, NAMELY, BODY SCRUB, FOOT SCRUB AND HAND SCRUB; SPRAYS, NAMELY, BODY SPRAY; CREAMS, NAMELY, BODY CREAM, HAND CREAM, FOOT CREAM; LOTIONS, NAMELY BODY LOTION, HAND LOTION; LIQUID SOAPS, NAMELY, BODY WASH AND FOAMING BODY WASH: SCENTED ROOM SPRAY; BODY BUTTER | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | Candles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 18, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |