USPTO serial 77418478
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Viet X. Do
Rosanna Eusebio3523 Eastham DriveCulver City, CA 90232UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, eye color, makeup, eye shadow, eyeliner, eyebrow pencil, eye pencil, lip gloss, lipstick, non-medicated lip balm, mascara, nail polish, blush, concealer, compacts, artificial eyelashes, artificial fingernails, nail polish top coat, nail polish base coat, lip foundation, eyebrow gloss, lash primer, brow primer, lip primer, eye primer, face primer, eye brightener gel, eye brightener cream, color correctors, tinted moisturizers, liquid foundation, cream foundation, power foundation, shine control gel, facial blotting papers, bronzers, eye shadow, pressed eye shadow, loose eye shadow, cream eye shadow, liquid eye shadow, mousse eye shadow, eyeshadow base, eyeliner, liquid eyeliner, eyeliner pencil, gel eyeliner, cream eyeliner, powder eyeliner, mascara, mascara primer, waterproof mascara, false eyelashes, false eyelash adhesive, eyebrow tint, eyebrow gel, eyebrow powder, eyebrow filler, lip gloss, lip plumper, lipstick, lip stain, lip pencil, gel lip color, cheek color, cream blush, powder blush, gel blush, mousse blush, blush, illuminizer, namely, a cream or powder makeup containing a shimmer, and nail treatment; skin care products, namely, astringent for cosmetic purposes, bath gel, bath oil, bath powder, beauty mask, body lotion, bubble bath, eye cream, skin moisturizer, essential oils for personal use, make-up remover, facial scrubs, and skin emollients, facial cleansers, toners/astringent, facial moisturizer, facial cream, eye treatments, namely, eye gels and eye lotions, non-medicated lip treatments, anti-aging face treatment cream, anti-aging eye treatment cream, facial scrub, facial exfoliant, facial masks, non-medicated skin revitalizers, skin lighteners, face night treatment cream and oil control face treatment lotion; fragrances, namely, spray fragrances, solid fragrances, roll-on fragrances; bath and body products, namely, body cleansers, body moisturizers, body lotion, body cream, body treatments, namely, body powder, exfolients and scrub; hair products, namely, shampoo, dry shampoo, conditioner, non-medicated scalp treatment cream and styling gels | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 11, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |